Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Babcock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1933No. 29,354PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the judgment awarding plaintiff damages. Before the judgment Avas entered defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a neAV trial had been denied. So all questions raised by said motion, and to Avhich assignments of error in this court are directed, are for decision on this appeal.

The main contention is that defendant is not responsible for any damages plaintiff may have sustained. This was raised by defendant’s objection to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wadsworth v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Dowler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Williamson v. CainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Hjorth v. WhittenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Nelson v. McKenzie-hague Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API