Legal Opinion

Colt v. . Kimball

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1925PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by plaintiff to recover of the defendant the purchase price of a gas-lighting equipment. From a judgment on a verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals. New trial.

The verdict is as follows:

"Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, if so, in what amount? Answer: Nothing."

The plaintiff declared upon a written contract to purchase an acetylene gas-lighting plant for residential use, in the sum of $267.50. The defendant alleged that, on 2 March, 1920, plaintiff's agent promised him that the lighting outfit would be delivered to defendant, on his premises, not later than 60 days from that…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Griffin v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API