Early v. Eley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The defendants contend they were entitled to have the action dismissed as a matter of right for failure on the part of the plaintiff to file his complaint in due time. The contention cannot be sustained. G.S. 1-152 authorizes the judge, in his discretion, to enlarge time for pleading. Alexander v. Brown, 236 N.C. 212, 72 S.E. 2d 522; Aldridge v. Ins. Co., 194 N.C. 683, 140 S.E. 706. The exercise of the court’s discretion is not subject to review. Smith v. Ins. Co., 208 N.C. 99, 179 S.E. 457; Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N.C. 368, 117 S.E. 41.
At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.