Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Marriott assigns as error the holding of the Court of Appeals that the trial judge correctly refused to conclude that rescission should be allowed on grounds that the conveyance was illegal because Capitol had not complied with Section 20-5 (a) of the Subdivision Standards Ordinance of the City of Raleigh, which provides:
Before any real property located within the city or located outside the city within two (2) miles in any direction of the corporate limits shall be subdivided and offered for sale, and before any plat thereof shall be recorded in the registry of Wake County,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.