Carr v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The question is whether there is credible evidence which, if unexplained, would support the finding of the Industrial Commission in a workmen’s compensation case. Shawley v. Industrial Comm. (1962), 16 Wis. (2d) 535, 114 N. W. (2d) 872; Wagner v. Industrial Comm. (1956), 273 Wis. 553, 565, 79 N. W. (2d) 264, 80 N. W. (2d) 456; Indianhead Truck Lines v. Industrial Comm. (1962), 17 Wis. (2d) 562, 565, 117 N. W. (2d) 679. See also Seymour v. Industrial Comm., ante, p. 482, 131 N. W. (2d) 323.
Upon the record of this case, we must affirm. The testimony of Dr. Smith that in his opinion Carr did not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Shawley v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Wagner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Thomson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cook v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Mednicoff v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Liebmann Packing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Semons Department Store v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.