Wagner v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The employee Wagner raises the following contentions on this appeal:(1) That the evidence requires a finding that the temporary partial disability sustained by Wagner during the period from December 10, 1951, through August 15, 1952, was greater than 33% per cent.(2) That October 2, 1951, should have been determined as the date of injury, rather than April 6, 1951, for all disability occurring subsequent to October 2, 1951.(3) That the evidence requires a finding that Wagner did sustain permanent disability as a result of his employment by Ampco and that the finding to the contrary is without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Green Bay Drop Forge Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Fruit Boat Market v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Hagen v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Shawley v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Vande Zande v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Kohler Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.