Legal Opinion

Semons Department Store v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1971No. 244PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The employee, Romayne Staffin, is not a party to this appeal. The litigation is really between Semons Department Store (Semons) and its workmen’s compensation carrier, Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, and The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A & P), a former employer.

The ILHR Department found the compensable injury occurred while the applicant was an employee of Semons. Essentially, Semons takes the position the injury occurred while the applicant was an employee of A & P.

As we view the case, it presents two issues on appeal:(1) Was there credible evidence to sustain the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Beck v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mednis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olsen v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Swiss Colony, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Valadzic v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mednicoff v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Caporali v. Washington National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API