Legal Opinion
Grosinger v. Thill
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 2014No. 20130291PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Maurice Robert Thill appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in finding Thill remains a sexually dangerous individual.
I
[¶ 2] In August 2012, the district court found Thill was a sexually dangerous individual and committed him to the custody of the director of the Department of Human Services. In April 2018, Thill filed a petition for discharge with the district court and requested a hearing. Dr. Robert Li-sota, a licensed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interest of TannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Grosinger v. G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Interest of WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Grosinger v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.