Grosinger v. Thill

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Maurice Robert Thill appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Thill argues that the district court’s order was not, supported by clear and convincing evidence and that the findings are inadequate. We reverse and remand for specific findings of fact.

I

[¶2] In 2012 the district court found Thill was a sexually dangerous individual and committed him to the custody of the director of the Department of Human Services. In 2013 Thill filed a petition for discharge which the district court…