Legal Opinion

Grosinger v. G.L.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2014No. 20140034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] G.L.D. appealed from district court orders denying his motion to compel discovery and his petition for discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude the court abused its discretion in denying G.L.D.’s motion to compel discovery. We reverse the order denying the motion to compel discovery, and we vacate the order denying the petition for discharge and remand for further proceedings on that petition.

I

[¶ 2] In 2007, G.L.D. was committed to the custody of the Department of Human Services for treatment as a sexually dangerous individual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Interest of G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Interest of G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API