Legal Opinion

Interest of Whitetail

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2015No. 20140455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Nelson Whitetail, Sr., appeals from an order denying his petition for discharge as a sexually dangerous individual. Whitetail argues the district court erred by finding clear and convincing evidence exists that he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and by finding it lacked authority to order his release subject to supervision. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Whitetail was committed as a sexually dangerous individual by court order *835on December 21, 2012. Whitetail appealed the commitment order, which we affirmed. In re Whitetail, 2013 ND 143, 835 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Grosinger v. M.B.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawyer v. J.M.(In re J.M.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Matter of J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Interest of WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API