Interest of Tanner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kapsner, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kelly Tanner appeals from a district court order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and denying his petition for discharge from the North Dakota State Hospital. Because we conclude the district court order denying Tanner’s petition for discharge is supported by the record and is not induced by an erroneous view of the law, we affirm the district court order continuing civil commitment.
I
[¶ 2] In 2008, Tanner, age 22, was convicted of sexual assault for having sexual intercourse with a sixteen-year-old female in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-07. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Matter of WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lawyer v. J.M.(In re J.M.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Matter of J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Byers v. Voisine (In Re Voisine)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Matter of R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Burdick v. R.A.S. (In re R.A.S.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.