Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Wolff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2011No. 20100290PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeffrey Keith Wolff appeals from a trial court order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the trial court erred in finding the State proved by clear and convincing evidence he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In April 2006, the trial court found Wolff to be a sexually dangerous individual and committed him to the care, custody, and control of the executive director of the Department of Human Services. In May 2010, Wolff filed a petition for discharge and requested a hearing. Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Interest of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API