Legal Opinion
Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 14, 1946No. 48 and 64PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
Petitioner, Universal Oil Products Company, is a patent-holding and licensing company. In 1929 and 1931, it brought suits for infringement against the WinklerKoch Engineering Co. and the Root Refining Company, respectively. The suits were consolidated, the validity of the patents sustained, and decrees for their infringement entered. 6 F. Supp. 763. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in an opinion by Judge J. Warren Davis, affirmed the decrees, 78 F. 2d 991, and this Court, in October, 1935, denied certiorari. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 296 U. S. 626.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brockton Savings Bank v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., First United Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.