Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1939No. 543PublishedCited by 1,201 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

The case is here on certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which affirmed, 99 F. 2d 583, a decree of the District Court for the District of Maine, 23 F. Supp. 59, denying a petition for the allowance of counsel fees and expenses over and above the regular taxable costs. Certiorari was granted, 306 U. S. 623, because an important question of judicial administration pertaining to the exercise of federal equity jurisdiction was raiséd.

This case is another phase of a litigation that has been here before, Ticonic Bank v. Sprague, 303 U. S. 406, the circumstances of which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,201 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

1,196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API