Legal Opinion
Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 27, 1934No. 716, 895PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIEHDS, District Judge.
This suit charges defendants with infringement of two process patents for the production of gasoline by cracking cheap petroleum oil. Patent No. 1,392,629' was granted in 1921 to Carbon Petroleum Dubbs and thereupon assigned to the plaintiff. The other patent, No. 1,537,593, was granted in 1925 to the plaintiff upon an application filed in 1920 by Gustav Egloff. All claims of both patents are in suit except claim 6 of the Dubbs patent. ■
The defenses are noninfringement and invalidity. Stated more specifically, the defense of invalidity is: The Dubbs patent is invalid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Parks v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.