Legal Opinion
Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 26, 1935No. 5546, 5648PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
These suits were brought against the Root Refining Company by the Universal Oil Products Company, hereinafter called plaintiff, for the infringement of all the nine claims, except the sixth, of United States letters patent No. 1,392,629 issued to Carbon P. Dubbs, October 4, 1921, and by him assigned to the plaintiff, and all five claims of United States letters patent No. 1,537,593 issued to Gustav Egloif, May 12, 1925. Each patent is for a process lor the manufacture of gasoline from petroleum. The Root Refining Company defended on the ground that both patents were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.