Legal Opinion

Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1944No. Nos. 5546, 5648PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The proponents of the motion sub judice ask this court to award them reasonable counsel fees for services rendered as amici curiae performed at our direction and also seek reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. The fees sought are to compensate the movants and the estate of former Judge Arthur C. Denison.1 The amici appeared in open court, notice having been given to both the plaintiff and the defendant, and suggested that our judgments in the above entitled causes had been .procured by the plaintiff by corrupting a former judge of this court. The amici stated that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  5. In Re Midland United Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API