Legal Opinion

Hoke v. Hoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Peter J. Notaro, J.), entered June 11, 2004. The amended order determined defendant’s interest in plaintiff’s pension and retirement plan.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the seventh ordering paragraph and as modified the amended order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We note at the outset that, although no appeal lies as of right from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we treat plaintiffs notice of appeal from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Oram v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Kazel v. KazelNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Irato v. IratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Barbato v. BowdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Coulon v. CoulonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Varlaro v. VarlaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. PB-33 Doe v. RudolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API