Legal Opinion
Irato v. Irato
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). Although no appeal lies as of right from a QDRO, plaintiff raised timely objections prior to the entry of the QDRO and thereby preserved a record for our review. We therefore treat the notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal, grant the application and consider the merits of plaintiff’s contentions (see, Lavin v Lavin, 263 AD2d 932, 932-933).
We note at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rainbow v. SwisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Boronow v. BoronowNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lavin v. LavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Albert v. SchoenleestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gartley v. GartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Zebrowski v. ZebrowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Cuda v. CudaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hoke v. HokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Elwell v. ElwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.