Oram v. Capone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant County of Onondaga (County) failed to preserve for review its argument that, pursuant to Weiss v Fote (7 NY2d 579, rearg denied 8 NY2d *840934), the doctrine of qualified municipal immunity applies to bar recovery against it. The County argues for the first time on appeal that plaintiff failed to establish that its decision not to post reduced speed signs on the subject portion of Lafayette Road was the result of an inadequate study or that its decision lacked a reasonable basis.
A question of law appearing on the face of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Block v. MageeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Scheemaker v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cordero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ring v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Paul v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rew v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.