Legal Opinion

Coulon v. Coulon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A qualified domestic relations order (hereinafter QDRO) entered pursuant to a stipulation of settlement “can convey only those rights to which the parties stipulated as a basis for the judgment” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 304 [2002]). Thus, a court cannot issue a QDRO more expansive or “encompassing rights not provided in the underlying stipulation” (id.; see Von Buren v Von Buren, 252 AD2d 950, 950-951 [1998]; De Gaust v De Gaust, 237 AD2d 862, 863 [1997]).

Here, the parties’ 1992 stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged in their judgment of divorce, provides for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. De Gaust v. De GaustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Von Buren v. Von BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Kazel v. KazelNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dutille v. DutilleNew York Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Navarette v. NavaretteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Navarette v. NavaretteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API