Coulon v. Coulon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A qualified domestic relations order (hereinafter QDRO) entered pursuant to a stipulation of settlement “can convey only those rights to which the parties stipulated as a basis for the judgment” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 304 [2002]). Thus, a court cannot issue a QDRO more expansive or “encompassing rights not provided in the underlying stipulation” (id.; see Von Buren v Von Buren, 252 AD2d 950, 950-951 [1998]; De Gaust v De Gaust, 237 AD2d 862, 863 [1997]).
Here, the parties’ 1992 stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged in their judgment of divorce, provides for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- De Gaust v. De GaustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Von Buren v. Von BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kazel v. KazelNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dutille v. DutilleNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- Navarette v. NavaretteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Navarette v. NavaretteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013