Kazel v. Kazel
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
A judgment of divorce and qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) awarding an interest in the husband’s pension plan do not automatically include preretirement death benefits available under the plan. If the intent is to distribute such benefits, that should be separately, and explicitly, stated.
After 28 years of marriage, Robert and Sandra Kazel were divorced in 1991. In accordance with a final posttrial judgment distributing the marital property by, among other things, divid ing the husband’s pension plan between the parties pursuant to the equitable…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ndulo v. NduloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ross v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hoke v. HokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Valentin v. New York City Police Pension FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.