Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Feinman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2002PublishedCited by 402 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

This appeal involves the statute of limitations in a legal malpractice action implicating a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) under the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ([ERISA] 29 USC § 1001 et seq.). Plaintiff, the wife in an underlying divorce action, sued her former attorneys alleging that they negligently failed to secure preretirement death benefits under her ex-husband’s employee benefit plan. The trial court and a divided Appellate Division concluded that the action was time-barred. Because neither plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by402 opinions

  1. Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Simkin v. BlankNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Rubens v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

397 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API