Burrill v. Robert Marsh & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
Two cases involving the same questions are before us on appeal, one brought by A. W. Burrill, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Estate of United Finance Company, a corporation, and the other by Herman C. Smith [Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co., (Mem.) (31 Pac. (2d) 826)]. Robert Marsh & Company, Inc., and Robert Marsh were named defendants in each action. In the Smith case A. W. Burrill, as trustee in bankruptcy, appeared as intervener.
In the discussion that follows reference will be made to the one case wherein Burrill, as trustee, is plaintiff.
The controversy arises over a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Patten v. Pepper Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Crossmore v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Hollywood Knickerbocker, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Piedmont Capital Management v. McElfishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.