Legal Opinion
Crossmore v. Page
California Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1887No. 11798PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note executed by Page to Rhodes, and by the latter indorsed to the plaintiff.
The court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment as prayed for against both Page and Rhodes, but upon motion duly made granted a new trial as to Rhodes. From that order the plaintiff appeals.
The note, to secure the payment of which the mortgage was executed, reads as follows: —
“ $8,153.50. “ Stockton, Cal., June 30, 1884.
“ On or before three years after date, without grace, I promise to pay to Alonzo Rhodes, or order,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Trinity County Bank v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.