Legal Opinion

Jessup Farms v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1983No. L.A. 31478PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

Eileen Baldwin appeals from a judgment awarding respondents—Jessup Farms, a general partnership, and its partners, individual *643members of the Jessup family—contribution for payments made on an obligation for which appellant was a co-obligor; ordering specific performance in favor of respondents of a contract for the purchase of securities in Holstein Heifer Ranch, Inc. (HHR); and denying appellant’s cross-complaint for an equitable lien on stock transferred to respondents.

The primary issue we consider is whether payments made by HHR, in which appellant and respondents owned…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API