S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chickering & Gregory, and Thomas H. Breeze, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is one of a group of seventeen cases, in each of which the defendant appeals from a judgment against it.
The several actions were brought by different plaintiffs, as holders of bonds issued by Monterey and Pacific Grove Railway Company (herein called the “Railway Company”), to recover on a written guaranty by the defendant (herein -called the “Gas Company”) of the payment of such bonds. In each action the plaintiff had judgment for the full amount of the principal of the bonds so held, together with accrued interest. In some of the cases the defendant failed to answer after the overruling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Adams v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Chinn v. PennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Aronson & Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Loeb v. ChristieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.