Conon v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAlcobn, J.
These two appeals were presented together because they embrace an identical issue. The plaintiffs are representative of others in similar-cases the decision of which turns upon the decisive-issue here. The applicable facts are, in most respects, identical, while minor differences make the-two cases representative of opposing extremes of the group which they represent. The attacks made-on the commissioner’s finding have been withdrawn. The issue is whether a payment described as a “vacation check” received by the plaintiffs from an employer-financed fund administered by the plaintiffs’ union…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Brannigan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Kneeland v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- McGowan v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- G. H. Bass & Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Geremia v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.