Legal Opinion

Conon v. Administrator

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcobn, J.

These two appeals were presented together because they embrace an identical issue. The plaintiffs are representative of others in similar-cases the decision of which turns upon the decisive-issue here. The applicable facts are, in most respects, identical, while minor differences make the-two cases representative of opposing extremes of the group which they represent. The attacks made-on the commissioner’s finding have been withdrawn. The issue is whether a payment described as a “vacation check” received by the plaintiffs from an employer-financed fund administered by the plaintiffs’ union…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Brannigan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Kneeland v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. McGowan v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. G. H. Bass & Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Geremia v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API