Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiffs in this case are employees of the High Standard Manufacturing Corporation, a subject employer under the Unemployment Compensation Act, and work in one of the corporation’s plants on Dixwell Avenue in Hamden. They seek to recover unemployment compensation for the work week in which July 4 fell, during which the employer shut down its plant in order, so it claimed, that the employees might have a vacation.
On January 5, 1948, the corporation entered into an agreement with a labor union representing the plaintiffs. This agreement contained the following provisions: “Article VI.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Harris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Wellman v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Dauber's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Schettino v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Cervantes v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Adams v. Rev. Bd. Ind. Emp. SEC. Div.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Battaglia v. BD. OF REVIEW, EMPLOYMENT SEC. DIV.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.