Geremia v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
The decisive question presented in these cases is whether holiday pay, so-called, is to be considered earned remuneration in determining whether an employee is partially unemployed under the provisions of § 31-229 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958 (Rev. 1949, § 7502), and so entitled to receive partial unemployment benefits. The pertinent portion of the statute reads: “An eligible individual who is partially unemployed throughout a week . . . shall be paid with respect to such week an amount equal to the excess of his benefit rate for total unemployment over the total remuneration of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Erickson v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Hill v. REVIEW BOARD, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parker v. GeraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- McGowan v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Iowa Malleable Iron Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Moore v. State of Delaware Unemploy. Comp. Com'nSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.