Legal Opinion

Geremia v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.

The decisive question presented in these cases is whether holiday pay, so-called, is to be considered earned remuneration in determining whether an employee is partially unemployed under the provisions of § 31-229 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958 (Rev. 1949, § 7502), and so entitled to receive partial unemployment benefits. The pertinent portion of the statute reads: “An eligible individual who is partially unemployed throughout a week . . . shall be paid with respect to such week an amount equal to the excess of his benefit rate for total unemployment over the total remuneration of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Erickson v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Hill v. REVIEW BOARD, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. GeraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. McGowan v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Iowa Malleable Iron Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Moore v. State of Delaware Unemploy. Comp. Com'nSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API