Legal Opinion

Kneeland v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 15, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The question posed on this appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to unemployment compensation during the time he remains unemployed following his involuntary retirement and while he is being paid a pension by his last employer.

The finding of the unemployment commissioner was not printed in the record. It has been furnished to us by agreement of counsel, and the material facts appearing in it are the following: The plaintiff is a former employee of the Phoenix Insurance Company. His employment commenced in May, 1913, and continued until December 31, 1950, when he was compelled by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Price v. Society for SavingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Hooker v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dubois v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  2. Salz v. State House CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Holmes v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Brannigan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Conon v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API