Legal Opinion
Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 16, 1992No. 10664PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHetman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant on the second, fourth, sixth and seventh counts of the complaint. The trial court rendered its judgment after granting the defendant’s motion to strike these counts and their corresponding prayers for relief. See Practice Book § 152 (1).
The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to apply retrospectively Public Acts 1990, No. 90-55, amending General Statutes § 31-72, (2) found that he had not stated a cause of action under General Statutes § 31-72 as it existed before its amendment by Public…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Heigl v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Karch v. BayBank FSBSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Claps v. Moliterno Stone Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Fennell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.