Legal Opinion
Peerless Insurance v. Disla
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1998No. 3:97CV00904 (GLG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
GOETTEL, District Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, Peerless Insurance Company seeks a declaration of its duty to defend defendant Braulio Disla, its insured, in a state-court action brought by William Kosbob, as Father and Next Best Friend of Mathew Kosbob, for personal injuries suffered by Mathew. Peerless contends that all claims asserted in the underlying lawsuit are specifically excluded from coverage and, therefore, Peerless has no duty to defend Disla or to indemnify him if a judgment is rendered against him. Peerless has filed a motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- General Accident Group v. GagliardiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Jurrius v. MacCabees Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Harleysville Worcester Ins. v. Paramount Concrete, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Farm Family Casualty Insurance Co. v. SamperiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. CicconeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. EspachDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.