Legal Opinion
Jurrius v. MacCabees Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1984No. Civ. H-82-775PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLARIE, Senior District Judge.
The defendant Maccabees Mutual Life Insurance Company, (“Maccabees”), has moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to grant summary judgment in its favor against Jacqueline Jurrius (“the plaintiff”). Maccabees, which insured the life of the plaintiff’s husband, Robert Jurrius (“the decedent” or “Jurrius”) under a group term policy, contends that the uncontroverted facts surrounding Jurrius’ death fell within a contractual exclusion to accidental death and dismemberment coverage under said policy. The Court finds,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Weingarten v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Standard Structural Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Peerless Insurance v. DislaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Cox v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Providence Washington Insurance Group v. AlbarelloDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.