Legal Opinion

Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-562PublishedCited by 2,512 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case asks whether the discretionary standard set forth in Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Co. of America, 316 U. S. 491 (1942), or the “exceptional circumstances” test developed in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U. S. 800 (1976), and Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U. S. (1983), governs a district court’s decision to stay a declaratory judgment action during the pendency of parallel state court proceedings, and under what standard of review a court of appeals should evaluate the district court’s decision to do so.

I

In early 1992, a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,512 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

2,507 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API