Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Espach
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 12, 2004No. 3:93-r-00057PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COVELLO, Senior District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment brought in connection with an automobile liability insurance policy. The plaintiff, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) seeks a declaration that it is under no duty to defend or indemnify the defendant, Claudette Espach, in a state superior court action filed against her as the administra-trix of the estate of her deceased son, Michael Espach. The plaintiff in the state court action is one Andrew Conway, who was injured in a one car…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Jurrius v. MacCabees Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Empire Indemnity Insurance v. Allstate County Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- Garcia v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCEDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Garcia v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010