Legal Opinion
Harleysville Worcester Ins. v. Paramount Concrete, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2014No. 3:11cv578(SRU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS PARAMOUNT CONCRETE’S AND R.I. POOLS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
This is an insurance coverage action relating to claims for damage to swimming pools constructed with defectively produced concrete, known- as “shotcrete.” Plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company (“Harleysville”) has brought this declaratory judgment action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 1382(a)(1), against defendant Paramount Concrete (“Paramount”), defendant R.I. Pools, and Paramount’s excess liability insurer, defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ironics, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Black & Veatch Corp. v. Aspen Ins. (Uk) Ltd.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- North Star Mutual Insurance v. RoseDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Thruway Produce, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.