Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trump Wilshire Associates
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 29, 1996No. Docket Nos. B083679, B086822PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
This case involves the decision of the Los Angeles Unified School District of Los Angeles County (the District) to condemn the Ambassador Hotel property, and its later decision to abandon the condemnation in the midst of the decline in commercial real estate values in Southern California. In the interim, the owner of the property, Trump Wilshire Associates, was forced to delay plans for development—plans which may now be impossible to revive. Trump Wilshire appeals the denial of its motion to set aside the abandonment and its motion for damages based on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- McGee v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Torrance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Community Development Commission v. ShufflerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Redevelopment Agency v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Saratoga Fire Protection District v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGCY v. Force ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Wilshire Center MarketplaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cmty. Redevelopment Agency of Hawthorne v. Force Elecs.California Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.