Legal Opinion
Community Development Commission v. Shuffler
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1988No. Docket Nos. D004658, D005041, D004186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Condemnees, Rex. L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler (Shufflers), appeal orders denying their motion to set aside an abandonment of a condemnation proceeding by the Community Development Commission of the City of Oceanside (Commission) (D005041, notice of appeal filed Aug. 1, 1986) and granting Commission’s motion for a new trial subject to remittitur (D004658, notice of appeal filed June 10, 1986).
Pacific Ltd. and Pacific Center Tower One (collectively, PCTO), defendants whose defaults were entered in the condemnation proceeding, appeal orders denying motions to set aside…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cook v. Stewart McKee & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- McGee v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. C. F. Bolster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Milenbach v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trump Wilshire AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Milenbach v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Wilshire Center MarketplaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Gold Ridge Partners v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012