Legal Opinion
Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 2004No. E033862PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Code of Civil Procedure section 1263.240 1 provides that improvements to real property made after summons is served in an eminent domain proceeding “shall not be taken into account in determining compensation unless . . . [f] . . . [f] (c) The improvement is one authorized to be made by a court order issued after a noticed hearing and upon a finding by the court that the hardship to the defendant of not permitting the improvement outweighs the hardship to the plaintiff of permitting the improvement. . . .”
The question here is whether a property owner, who makes…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Eastern Municipal Water District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Weiss v. P. ex rel. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020