Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Heller
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1988No. B019867PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, Acting P. J.
Respondent Redevelopment Agency of the City of Pomona filed a complaint in eminent domain against appellant Kenneth B. Heller as trustee, to acquire appellant’s real property for a redevelopment project. Subsequently respondent abandoned this eminent domain proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1268.510.) More than 30 days after notice of abandonment, appellant filed opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding, and requested leave to file a second amended answer to the complaint in eminent domain, seeking to recover monetary damages for precondemnation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Tilem v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trump Wilshire AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Redevelopment Agency v. ErganianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989