Legal Opinion

City of Torrance v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1976No. L.A. 30507PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

The City of Torrance, a municipal corporation (the City) seeks a peremptory writ of mandate commanding respondent superior court to dismiss an action in eminent domain brought by the City against real party in interest Fujita Corporation USA (Fujita). The Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Division Five, issued an alternative writ, and Fujita filed a return by demurrer and answer. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 56(c).) For the reasons set forth below we deny the petition and discharge the alternative writ.

The facts, as established by the pleadings and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Santa Clarita Water Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API