Legal Opinion

Saratoga Fire Protection District v. Hackett

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2002No. H022553PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, Acting P. J.

Defendant W. Charles Hackett 1 appeals judgment in an eminent domain proceeding brought by plaintiff Saratoga Fire Protection District in which defendant was not allowed to produce evidence that his Saratoga office building was worth $3.2 million at the time of trial. Defendant contends California’s eminent domain law is unconstitutional as applied to him because the mandatory use of the date the complaint was filed as the valuation date denied him “just compensation” by depriving him of the $1.2 million he claims the value of the property increased in the year…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v. MesdaqCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. City of Scottsdale v. CGP-Aberdeen, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Forest Preserve District v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API