Legal Opinion

Fairbairn v. Eaton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1935No. Civ. 1708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. The demurrer raised two objections to the sufficiency of this pleading, which we will hereafter refer to as the complaint, that neither it nor its several counts stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Claude S. Eaton, the demurring defendant, and that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter attempted to be stated in the complaint or its counts. The trial court sustained the demurrer on the second ground and refused the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rocha v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sackett Enterprises, Inc. v. StarenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. DeMonbrun v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Payne v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API