Sizemore v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*459CARSON, C. J.
This is an original proceeding in which petitioner challenges the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 59 (1998). If adopted, Measure 59 would amend the Oregon Constitution to prohibit public funds from being spent to collect or assist in the collection of “political funds.” The measure defines “political funds” as funds contributed to a candidate or political action committee, or funds spent to support or oppose a candidate for public office or a ballot measure.
An explanatory statement committee, composed of five citizens including petitioner, prepared an explanatory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCormick v. Kroger/DevlinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Buel/Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Novick v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Dudley v. JenksOregon Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.