Legal Opinion

June v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1990No. SC S37381PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Petitioner, an elector of the State of Oregon, seeks review of a Ballot Measure Explanatory Statement. Petitioner offered suggestions concerning the Statement at the hearing on the Statement held by the respondent Secretary of State 2 pursuant to ORS 251.215(2). 3 Because suggestions were made, petitioner has standing to bring this proceeding. We modify the Explanatory Statement to the extent set forth below.

The text of the Explanatory Statement is as follows: 4

“This measure would halt operations at the Trojan Nuclear Plant on December 6,1990.
“Before Trojan is allowed to operate again, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. MacAfee v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sollis v. HandOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lewis v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Conkling v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Deras v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API