Novick v. Bradbury
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 8 (2000). See ORS 251.205 (providing for creation and manner of selection of committee of five citizens to prepare explanatory statement for initiated and referred measures); ORS 251.215 (providing for preparation and filing of explanatory statement by committee). The initiative measure would amend Article IX of the Oregon Constitution by adding a requirement that, unless a specified exemption applies, appropriations for state government expenditures shall not exceed 15 percent of the state’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- MacAfee v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Deras v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parks v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- State v. FarmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017