Legal Opinion

Novick v. Bradbury

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2000No. SC S47796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 8 (2000). See ORS 251.205 (providing for creation and manner of selection of committee of five citizens to prepare explanatory statement for initiated and referred measures); ORS 251.215 (providing for preparation and filing of explanatory statement by committee). The initiative measure would amend Article IX of the Oregon Constitution by adding a requirement that, unless a specified exemption applies, appropriations for state government expenditures shall not exceed 15 percent of the state’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. MacAfee v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Deras v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parks v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
  2. State v. FarmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API