Legal Opinion

Homuth v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1992No. SC S39531 (Control) SC S39532PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioners Roger Graybeal and Automobile Club of Oregon (AAA) (petitioners) and petitioner/intervenor Don Homuth (intervenor) bring an original proceeding in this court pursuant to ORS 251.235, seeking review of the explanatory statement for 1992 Ballot Measure 4, to be included in the Voters’ Pamphlet for the next general election. If passed, Ballot Measure 4 would prohibit the operation of so-called “triples” in Oregon. The Oregon Department of Transportation defines a “triple” as a truck pulling two trailers or atruck tractor pulling three semitrailers. Pursuant to ORS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. MacAfee v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sollis v. HandOregon Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lewis v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Deras v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Novick v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dudley v. JenksOregon Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API