Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Powell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding to review the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 15 prepared for inclusion in the voters’ pamphlet for the November 4, 1986 election. The statement was prepared by a committee appointed pursuant to ORS 251.205. The committee filed the statement with the Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 251.255. Petitioner Tele-dyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) seeks review of the statement under ORS 251.235. Some of petitioner’s contentions are correct. We conclude this opinion with a modified explanatory statement to be included in the voters’ pamphlet.
The committee’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Blaine v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Sollis v. HandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Conkling v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.