Legal Opinion

Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Powell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1986No. S33132PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding to review the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 15 prepared for inclusion in the voters’ pamphlet for the November 4, 1986 election. The statement was prepared by a committee appointed pursuant to ORS 251.205. The committee filed the statement with the Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 251.255. Petitioner Tele-dyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) seeks review of the statement under ORS 251.235. Some of petitioner’s contentions are correct. We conclude this opinion with a modified explanatory statement to be included in the voters’ pamphlet.

The committee’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Blaine v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sollis v. HandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Conkling v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API